Just a quick post here that has to do with the OK of the EU to ban cultivation of genetically modified maize for the countries of Austria and Hungary. In the EU since 1998 - after a review by the European Food Safety Authority EFSA - a genetically modified maize from Monsanto admitted. Austria and Hungary have banned their cultivation anyway. The European Commission is seeking a single solution for Europe, and therefore wants to repeal the national ban on cultivation. So a decision to conduct the first ever in the way, but it takes a majority of EU environment ministers. And they rejected a few days ago once again the proposal.
Now I want to fire up any policy discussion, because their reasons for or against genetically modified organisms and their use in agriculture. I feel really just a question of which very different reasons our Environment Minister Gabriel has called for its decision on the alignment of EU environment ministers. There were certainly no environmental concerns.
I can not see why we follow the interests of a single American company and apply it in the Member States citizens are against us [...]People do not want GMOs, so we ban it? Hopefully not get too many taxpayers know how politics works ...
And what is to follow the interests of a single American company? Since only this one maize Europe's only approved genetically modified crop is this has anything to do with a preference - and the competition from Monsanto can produce GMOs and then allow the EU for cultivation can be. About the negative political atmosphere will make the only no. And if so many citizens against genetic engineering in agriculture but, then that should settle it on the market by itself, right?
Source: biotechnologie.de found
0 comments:
Post a Comment